Ambrose on the Origin of Evil

I think Ambrose’s analysis of the origin of evil does not take into account the powers and principalities that Scripture addresses. That notwithstanding, the good bishop reminds us to take seriously the evil that resides in each of us and to acknowledge our responsibility in allowing evil a pathway to manifest itself in God’s good world to corrupt and despoil it (and us). There is way too little of that acknowledgement going on in our culture today and it results in more disorder and chaos.

During this season of Lent with its emphasis on self-examination and repentance, we would be wise to reflect on what Ambrose has to say and ask the Lord to help us vanquish the evil that is in each of us by the power of his Holy Spirit. We must do our sweat equity, of course, but our sweat equity will be for nothing without help from the Lord (cf. Psalm 121.1-8). This is a worthy project for anyone who claims himself to be a Christian, both during Lent and every day of our life, because this work will take a lifetime. See what you think.

If evil is not something that has no principle from which it springs, as is the case of the uncreated Being; and if it is not something that God has made, where does it come from? For no wise person will deny the existence of evil in this world. We are all familiar with the evil of death. But from what we have said it is evident that evil is not a living substance. It is a pervasion of mind and spirit, swerving from the way of true virtue, which frequently overtakes the unwary.

We see also that the greater danger does not come from outside us. It comes from our very selves. The enemy is within us. Within us is the progenitor of our error; within us, I say, dwells our adversary. Hence, we must examine our aims, explore the habits of our minds, be watchful over our thoughts and over the desires of our heart.

You yourself are the cause of your wickedness. You yourself are the commander of your shameful acts, and the instigator of your crimes. Why blame another agent as an excuse for your own faults? Oh! that you would not incite yourself, that you would not rush heedlessly on, that you would not entangle yourself in immoderate endeavors, or in indignation and passionate desires, for these hold you captive as in nets.

Most certainly it belongs to us, and we are able to moderate our endeavors, to restrain our anger, to curb our desires. But we can also yield to wantonness, foster evil passions, inflame our anger or give ear to those who incite to anger, become puffed up with pride, or give in to fits of anger instead of humbly lowering ourselves and lovingly practicing gentleness.

Hence, why should we accuse “nature”? There are impediments in nature; there is old age and infirmity. But both have also advantages: old age brings more friendly manners, gives more useful counsels, inspires more readiness to accept death, and helps curb evil passions more easily. The weakness of the body too has as counterpart the sobriety of mind. Hence, the Apostle says: “When I am powerless, it is then I am strong.” Accordingly, he gloried in his infirmities, and not in his powers. And there came to him the luminous and salutary answer that “in weakness power is made perfect.”

Let us therefore not seek for causes outside ourselves nor blame others for them. Let us acknowledge our guilt. For we must willingly attribute to ourselves, not to others, whatever evil we can avoid doing when we so choose.

—Ambrose, Bishop of Milan (4th Century), The Six Days of Creation 1.31-32

Augustine on Granting Pardon

Pardon, that you may be pardoned. In doing this, nothing is required of the body. It is the will that acts. You will experience no physical pain; you will have nothing less in your home.

Now in truth, my brothers and sisters, you see what an evil it is that those who have been commanded to love even their enemy do not pardon a penitent brother or sister.

—Sermon 210.10

Who is it that you need to pardon in your life? Who needs to pardon you? Seek them out and make it so. Doing so will help bring in the kingdom and give glory to God who loves and has pardoned you. Remember the cross is not a “get out of jail free” card.

Cyril of Jerusalem on the Cross

The Catholic Church glories in every deed of Christ. Her supreme glory, however, is the cross. Well aware of this, Paul says: “God forbid that I glory in anything but the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ!”

At Siloam, there was a sense of wonder, and rightly so.A man born blind recovered his sight. But of what importance is this, when there are so many blind people in the world? Lazarus rose from the dead, but even this only affected Lazarus. What of those countless numbers who have died because of their sins? Those five miraculous loaves fed five thousand people. Yet this is a small number compared to those all  over the world who were starved by ignorance. After eighteen years a woman was freed from the bondage of Satan. But are we not all shackled by the chains of our own sins?

For us all, however, the cross is the crown of victory! It has brought light to those blinded by ignorance. It has released those enslaved by sin. Indeed, it has redeemed the whole of humankind! Do not, then, be ashamed of the cross of Christ; rather, glory in it. Although it is a stumbling block to the Jews and folly to the Gentiles, the message of the cross is our salvation. Of course it is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it was not a mere human being who died for us, but the Son of God, God-made-human.

Jesus did not blush at the cross for by it he was to save the world. No, it was not a lowly human being who suffered, but God incarnate. Certainly in times of tranquility the cross should give you joy. But maintain the same faith in times of persecution. Otherwise you will be a friend of Jesus in times of peace and his enemy during war. Now you receive the forgiveness of your sins and the generous gift of grace from your king. When war comes, fight courageously for him.

Jesus never sinned; yet he was crucified for you. Will you refuse to be crucified for him, who for your sake was nailed to the cross? You are not the one who gives the favor; you have received one first.

—Cyril, Bishop of Jerusalem Catechesis

Why is the cross folly to some? Because our pride bristles at the notion that we are helpless to save ourselves from God’s holy wrath. Why is the cross represent glory to others? Because we acknowledge that we are helpless to save ourselves from God’s holy wrath and thankful that God bore his wrath himself. Think on this during Lent, unless, of course, you consider yourself to know more than God. Never stop peering into the mystery of the cross. Never stop plumbing the depths of God’s great love for you or for his wondrous desire for you to live with him forever in worship, love, praise, and obedience.

An Account of How Those Who Were Baptized at Easter Were Instructed During Lent in Fourth-Century Jerusalem

The season of Lent has always been a time when the Church prepared new converts to become full members by instructing them in matters of the faith and preparing them for baptism. Here is a description from how this was done in the 4th century in Jerusalem.

I must also describe how those who are baptized at Easter are instructed. Those who give their names do so the day before Lent, and the priest notes down all their names; and this is before those eight weeks during which, as I have said, Lent is observed here. When the priest has noted down everyone’s name, then on the following day, the first day of Lent, on which the eight weeks begin, a throne is set up for the bishop in the center of the major church, the Martyrium. The priests sit on stools on both sides, and all the clergy stand around. One by one the candidates are led forward, in such a Way that the men come with their godfathers and the women with their godmothers.

Then the bishop questions individually the neighbors of the one who has come up, inquiring; “Does this person lead a good life? Obey parents? Is this person a drunkard or a liar?” And the bishop seeks out in the candidate other vices which are more serious. If the person proves to be guiltless in all these matters concerning which the bishop has questioned the witnesses who are present, the bishop notes down the candidate’s name. If, however, the candidate is accused of anything, the bishop orders the person to go out and says: “Let such a one amend their life, and when this is done, then approach the baptismal font.” He makes the same inquiry of both men and women.  If, however, some are strangers, such people cannot easily receive baptism, unless they have witnesses who know them.

Ladies, my sisters, I must describe this, lest you think that it is done without explanation. It is the custom here, throughout the forty days on which there is fasting, for those who are preparing for baptism to be exorcised by the clergy early in the morning, as soon as the dismissal from the morning service has been given at the Anastasis. Immediately a throne is placed for the bishop in the major church, the Martyrium. All those who are to be baptized, both men and women, sit closely around the bishop, while the godmothers and godfathers stand there; and indeed all of the people who wish to listen may enter and sit down, provided they are of the faithful. A catechumen, however, may not enter at the time when the bishop is teaching them the law. The bishop does so in this way: beginning with Genesis and going through the whole of Scripture during these forty days, expounding first its literal meaning and then explaining the spiritual meaning.  In the course of these days everything is taught not only about the Resurrection but concerning the body of faith. This is called catechetics.

When five weeks or instruction have been completed, they then receive the Creed The bishop explains the meaning of each of the phrases of the Creed in the same way as Holy Scripture was explained, expounding first the literal and then the spiritual sense. ln this fashion the Creed is taught.

And thus it is that in these places all the faithful are able to follow the Scriptures when they are read in the churches, because all are taught through these forty days, that is, from the first to the third hours, for during the three hours instruction is given. God knows, ladies, my sisters,  that the voices of the faithful who have come to catechetics to hear instruction on those things being said or explained by the bishop are louder than when the bishop sits down in church to preach about each of those matters which are explained in this fashion. The dismissal from catechetics is given at the third hour, and immediately, singing hymns, they lead the bishop to the Anastasis [the cross], and the office of the third hour takes place. And thus they are taught for three hours a day for seven weeks. During the eighth week, the one which is called the Great Week, there remains no more time for them to be taught, because what has been mentioned above must be carried out.

Now when seven weeks have gone by and there remains only Holy Week, which is here called the Great Week, then the bishop comes in the morning to the major church, the Martyrium. To the rear, at the apse behind the altar, a throne is placed for the bishop, and one by one they come forth, the men with their godfathers, the women with their godmothers. And each one recites the Creed back to the bishop. After the Creed has been recited back to the bishop, the bishop delivers a homily to them all, and says: “During these seven weeks you have been instructed in the whole law of the Scriptures, and you have heard about the faith. You have also heard of the resurrection of the flesh. But as for the whole explanation of the Creed, you have heard only that which you are able to know while you are still catechumens. Because you are still catechumens, you are not able to the those things which belong to a higher mystery, that of baptism. But that you may not think that anything would be done without explanation, once you have been baptized in the name of God, you will hear of them during the eight days of Easter in the Anastasis following the dismissal from church. Because you are still catechumens, the most secret of the divine mysteries cannot be told to you.”

—Egeria, Abbess (late 4th century), The Pilgrimage of Egeria, 45-46

About St. Patrick

From here:

Apostle of Ireland, born at Kilpatrick, near Dumbarton, in Scotland, in the year 387; died at Saul, Downpatrick, Ireland, 17 March, 493. Some sources say 460 or 461. He had for his parents Calphurnius and Conchessa. The former belonged to a Roman family of high rank and held the office of decurio in Gaul or Britain. Conchessa was a near relative of the great patron of Gaul, St. Martin of Tours. Kilpatrick still retains many memorials of Saint Patrick, and frequent pilgrimages continued far into the Middle Ages to perpetuate there the fame of his sanctity and miracles. In his sixteenth year, Patrick was carried off into captivity by Irish marauders and was sold as a slave to a chieftain named Milchu in Dalriada, a territory of the present county of Antrim in Ireland, where for six years he tended his master’s flocks in the valley of the Braid and on the slopes of Slemish, near the modern town of Ballymena.

Check him out.

A Prayer for the Feast of St. Patrick

Almighty God, who in your providence chose your servant Patrick to be the apostle of the Irish people, to bring those who were wandering in darkness and error to the true light and knowledge of you: Grant us so to walk in that light, that we may come at last to the light of everlasting life; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and ever. Amen.

St. Patrick’s Breastplate

I bind unto myself today
The strong Name of the Trinity,
By invocation of the same
The Three in One and One in Three.

I bind this today to me forever
By power of faith, Christ’s incarnation;
His baptism in Jordan river,
His death on Cross for my salvation;
His bursting from the spicèd tomb,
His riding up the heavenly way,
His coming at the day of doom
I bind unto myself today.

I bind unto myself the power
Of the great love of cherubim;
The sweet ‘Well done’ in judgment hour,
The service of the seraphim,
Confessors’ faith, Apostles’ word,
The Patriarchs’ prayers, the prophets’ scrolls,
All good deeds done unto the Lord
And purity of virgin souls.

I bind unto myself today
The virtues of the star lit heaven,
The glorious sun’s life giving ray,
The whiteness of the moon at even,
The flashing of the lightning free,
The whirling wind’s tempestuous shocks,
The stable earth, the deep salt sea
Around the old eternal rocks.

I bind unto myself today
The power of God to hold and lead,
His eye to watch, His might to stay,
His ear to hearken to my need.
The wisdom of my God to teach,
His hand to guide, His shield to ward;
The word of God to give me speech,
His heavenly host to be my guard.

Against the demon snares of sin,
The vice that gives temptation force,
The natural lusts that war within,
The hostile men that mar my course;
Or few or many, far or nigh,
In every place and in all hours,
Against their fierce hostility
I bind to me these holy powers.

Against all Satan’s spells and wiles,
Against false words of heresy,
Against the knowledge that defiles,
Against the heart’s idolatry,
Against the wizard’s evil craft,
Against the death wound and the burning,
The choking wave, the poisoned shaft,
Protect me, Christ, till Thy returning.

Christ be with me, Christ within me,
Christ behind me, Christ before me,
Christ beside me, Christ to win me,
Christ to comfort and restore me.
Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ in quiet, Christ in danger,
Christ in hearts of all that love me,
Christ in mouth of friend and stranger.

I bind unto myself the Name,
The strong Name of the Trinity,
By invocation of the same,
The Three in One and One in Three.
By Whom all nature hath creation,
Eternal Father, Spirit, Word:
Praise to the Lord of my salvation,
Salvation is of Christ the Lord.

Fr. Ric Bowser: Our Father Abraham

Sermon delivered on the second Sunday in Lent, March 16, 2014, at St. Augustine’s Anglican Church, Columbus, OH.

Lectionary texts: Genesis 12.1-4a; Psalm 121.1-8; Romans 4.1-5, 13-17; John 3.1-17.

This morning Fr. Ric Bowser introduces himself and talks about the primary importance of the family, both for society and for the Christian faith. These days we don’t like to use the term patriarchal because many see it as an oppressive form of control. But is patriarchal the same as being a patriarch? Is that how the writer of Genesis used it? More importantly, is that how God meant it when he called Abraham and blessed him so that his family would be a blessing to the nations? Hear what Fr. Bowser has to say about this and see what you think.

To listen to the sermon, click here.

Fox News: Charity Offers to Pay for 7 Year Old’s Lifesaving Treatment; Drug Maker Still Refuses: UPDATED

On Tuesday I posted a story about the drug company, Chimerix’s, refusal to supply a life-saving drug to a dying boy. Here’s an update from Fox News.

Family and supporters of a 7-year-old boy dying from a rare bone marrow disorder were ecstatic Wednesday, after a drug company reversed its decision to deny him an experimental medicine that could save his life.

“We’re just looking forward to the great success of the drug and the great success of the company to help other people, just tremendously excited,” Aimee Hardy, mother of Josh Hardy, of Fredericksburg, Va., told Fox & Friends Wednesday morning. “As hard as we were as a group on the company, we’re going to push Josh to continue to do his best so that he can make that full recovery.”

Read it all and good for them. May God use this to heal the little guy.

Fox News: Charity Offers to Pay for 7 Year Old’s Lifesaving Treatment; Drug Maker Still Refuses

From Fox News. See my commentary below.

A pediatric cancer charity is offering to pay for 7-year-old cancer survivor Josh Hardy to receive lifesaving medication that could cure him of a potentially deadly virus.

But Chimerix, the pharmaceutical company that produces the medication, is still refusing to give Josh the treatment he so desperately needs.  In fact, a representative for the charity said he tried speaking with Chimerix CEO Kenneth Moch about Josh’s case – but Moch hung up on him.

Over the course of his childhood, Josh has survived four bouts of kidney cancer and even suffered from heart failure.  Then, in November 2013, he developed a bone marrow disorder as a result of his cancer treatments and underwent chemotherapy and a bone marrow transplant at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tenn. Though his treatments were a success, Josh subsequently developed adenovirus – an acute infection that can be deadly in people with compromised immune systems.

Doctors at St. Jude recommended that Josh be treated with Brincidofovir – an antiviral drug that has been proven to clear up adenovirus in children within two weeks.  However, the drug has not yet been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), preventing Josh’s family from gaining access to the medication.

Josh’s mother, Aimee Hardy, has appealed to Moch to grant Josh emergency access to the medication, but the company is refusing to make an exception.  According to Fox News’ Peter Johnson Jr., Chimerix has given hundreds of patients emergency access to Brincidofovir in the past, but Moch said the company has since stopped this practice because “they cannot afford it.”

Now, the Max Cure Foundation, a charity dedicated to researching rare pediatric cancers, has offered to pay for the cost of the drug – but Chimerix still won’t budge.

“I spoke to Mr. Moch yesterday by phone.  I told him that we had the $50,000 that I thought he was claiming he needed to supply the drug,” Richard Plotkin, vice chair of the Max Cure Foundation, told Johnson Jr. on Fox and Friends.  “He then told me it isn’t about money.  He told me it’s all about ethics.  I said, ‘Fine, tell me why you will not give [it to] this little boy.’ If he does not get the drug, he will die this week, I’m told.  He said he cannot make an exception.”

Read it all.

For those of you who have heard me preach, one of the things I say regularly is that human sin allows evil an inroad into God’s good world to corrupt and destroy it. If ever there is an awful example of how this dynamic works, you can find it right here in this sad story. Here we have the CEO of a drug company, Chimerix, initially claiming that the company cannot afford to save a life. Really?? REALLY??? In making this claim, the CEO, Kenneth Moch, is in effect telling the world that he and his company worship the dollar as their ultimate god. Moch will one day discover that the dollar does not have the power to either call things into existence that were not or raise him from the dead (Romans 4.17). Only God can do those things and that God calls all humans to bear his image faithfully. But in worshiping an unreal god (money) as Moch does, a young boy will likely die when the company has it in its power to help him live. This is how evil is allowed to work in God’s good world and it is both heartbreaking and maddening.

Not only is this an evil in itself, but in so refusing to help the child despite the fact that there are those who are willing to pay for the drug, Moch and his company are shirking their God-given duty to be good stewards of God’s world. Drug and medical research are good things and are quite consistent with our God-given charge to humans as the earth’s (and each other’s) caretakers. But that is not happening here.

Instead, in this instance a drug company and its CEO are acting wickedly. Their position is made even worse because after being initially honest about why Chimerix was refusing to sell this drug to save this boy (the company couldn’t afford it), now Moch falls back on the using the “ethical” canard of being “consistent.” What is ethical about consistency when it leads to a preventable death is never explained to us.

I hope Mr. Moch understands that one day he will have to stand before the judgment throne of the Lord. I also hope he realizes that excuse-making for acting evilly will not be tolerated or accepted. If Moch does not believe in God, so be it. But he would do well to rethink his foolishness and take to heart God’s command to all humans to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with their God (Micah 6.8). Moch and his company are doing none of this. Instead he is choosing to do selfishly, act mercilessly, and walk haughtily in his own self-centeredness/self-righteousness. Whether he believes it or not, the God of justice holds him accountable for this sin and for allowing evil to exert an even tighter grip on God’s world.

Hopefully this knowledge will lead Mr. Moch to reconsider his decision and move to help the doctors save this little boy’s life. If Moch does repent of this evil, he will find himself amazed and blessed when he acts in accordance with God’s good will and purposes for all human beings.

And before we get all haughty and self-righteous in condemning Moch’s behavior, let us remember that none of us is without sin and all of us will likewise have to stand before the Lord’s judgment throne and account for our own behavior that allowed evil to make further inroads into God’s good creation. This should help us keep proper perspective and  prevent our judgment on this evil decision from turning into judgmentalism. Lord have mercy. Christ have mercy. Lord have mercy.

Andrew Symes: Gay Marriage and the Church’s Response

A rock-solid analysis. See what you think.

Symes-AndrewAs the Archbishop of Canterbury has reminded us more than once, we are experiencing a cultural revolution in the area of public attitudes to sexual morality. The pace of change has been rapid. I am not yet 50 years old. When I was born, homosexual sex was illegal; now, in two weeks time, people of the same sex will marry, accompanied by celebrations all over the country here in the UK. The change has not evolved gradually, but has happened as part of a deliberate campaign. The change has been carefully controlled, by using media, the law and even science to promote the new ideas.

The changes have been rapidly accepted: importantly by people with power and influence, and then filtering down to the general population. The message has been imposed through a combination of relentless teaching and threats of punishment for resisting.  And there is a real belief that the changes are wholly positive and part of the progress of civilisation.

In the face of this remarkably successful campaign, how has the church responded? By and large, we have seen targeting, analysis, paralysis, and division. After looking at each of these in turn, we’ll see if we can discern any signs of hope.

It is a paradox that though one of the tenets of the media narrative about the church is its irrelevance, it is deemed relevant enough to be relentlessly targeted in the campaign for full ‘gay rights’. Why should it matter to the majority of gay people and those who support the successful campaign for full ‘equality’ what the church believes or does? And yet it clearly does matter, as these articles in today’s Daily Telegraph  and Guardian  show, together with the stream of comments.

Why have the newspapers found space for these opinions?  Because a church which conforms to secular humanism’s diktats remains usefully irrelevant and is a poodle rather than a lion. Would they print an article with the opposing view? A church which says “there is a higher authority than Caesar” is a counterrevolutionary threat, so if this view is given space, it is in order to ridicule and criticize it.

Read it all.